Between Everywhere and Nowhere

  • Am I Really Your Sunshine?

    Am I Really Your Sunshine?

    Woman Before the Rising Sun, Caspar David Friedrich

    You are my sunshine,
    My only sunshine…

    Such gentle, romantic words from such a gentle song.
    Soft enough to feel safe, simple enough to believe without questioning.

    But when someone says, “you are my sunshine,” I find myself asking:
    What does it really mean?

    The Sun is everything we associate with warmth and life.
    It nourishes. It grows. It makes existence possible. 
    And yet, that same Sun burns.
    It dries. It exhausts.

    Not out of intention, not out of emotion, but simply because this is what it is.

    Everything revolves around it — not because it is loved, but because it cannot be escaped.

    And maybe that is the part we don’t really think about.

    That the same source that feeds us is also, slowly and inevitably, consuming us.

    The Sun is not doing us a favor. It is not choosing to give, and it is not choosing to take.
    It simply exists in its own nature, and everything else learns how to live with it — or doesn’t.

    And I think that is why the word “sunshine” has never felt entirely soft to me.

    Because some people are like that.

    Not necessarily cruel.
    Not necessarily kind either.

    Just… intense in a way that changes things.

    They don’t enter your life with a clear intention to transform you.
    But their presence alone makes that transformation almost unavoidable.

    If not you, then someone else.
    If not now, then eventually.

    And sometimes, without even realizing it, the ones who need change the most
    are the ones who move closest to that kind of light.

    But maybe the real question was never about transformation.

    Because it will happen anyway. It always does.

    The real question is what kind of change you are standing close to.

    Will it warm you enough to grow, to become something fuller, more alive?

    Or will it take everything you have built and slowly burn it down, piece by piece?

    I might be your sunshine.

    But light is never just light.

    Will I warm you, help you grow into something fuller, more alive — or will I draw a circle of fire around you and keep you there until there is nothing left but something dry enough to burn?

    Is there even a middle ground, or is that just something we tell ourselves to stay a little longer?

    Please don’t take my sunshine away…

    What happens after you find your sun?

    Do you stay close out of warmth or out of fear of losing it?

    Do you begin to orbit, slowly forgetting your own direction?

    Everyone needs transformation at some point.
    The Sun is transformative by its very existence.

    But again — it is not the Sun.

    It is you.

    Is it up to you what to do with this force placed into your life?

    Will your snow withstand the light, or disappear beneath it?

    So, what will you do?

    Will you use the brightness to clear your vision, or let it blind you?

    Will you keep moving closer, mistaking the brightness for safety?

    Or will you recognize the heat for what it is and trace back the quiet marks
    it has already left on you?

    Again, the light was never the question.

    It was always you.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • What Do You Feel?

    What Do You Feel?

    A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte, Georges Seurat

    You woke up and started the day.

    What do you truly feel?

    Busy schedules, traffic jams, overpriced tags on the shelves…
    Life moves fast, almost mechanically.

    But somewhere in between all this — what is it that you actually feel?

    Have you ever paused, even for a minute, to notice what is passing through your mind, your heart, your body?
    Not only to explain or justify it, but simply to notice it.

    What is “to feel” anyway?
    Dictionaries define it simply as experiencing something physical or emotional. A simple definition for something that rarely feels simple.

    We know many names for what we feel: happy, sad, overwhelmed, devastated, embarrassed, angry.

    But there are moments when none of these quite fit — moments when language feels insufficient, and we find ourselves explaining a single feeling with entire paragraphs.

    Maybe the problem is not that we don’t feel enough.
    Maybe we just don’t always have the words.

    And when we don’t have the words, we sometimes begin to treat the feeling itself as if it doesn’t quite belong — as if it is too vague, too much, or simply unnecessary.

    But perhaps it is not the feeling that is unfamiliar, only the language surrounding it.

    I have never been someone who is consumed by emotions, nor someone who ignores them.

    I tend to sit with them, to make sense of them — sometimes at length.

    I could write pages about a single feeling.

    And yet, sometimes, what I look for is just one word.
    One term that reminds me I am not the only one who has felt this.

    This is where languages quietly step in.

    What has always fascinated me about them is this:
    Some seem to have paused longer on certain emotions — long enough to give them a name.

    There are moments when time suddenly feels limited — when you start measuring your life against invisible deadlines, and a quiet anxiety settles in.
    Not loud, not dramatic, but persistent.
    In German, there is a word for this: Torschlusspanik.

    Or those rare moments when you are completely immersed in the present — when nothing else seems to exist beyond what you are living right now.
    A kind of joy that is calm rather than loud.
    In Welsh, they call this Hwyl.

    Or the restless anticipation of waiting for someone — checking the door, looking outside, feeling time stretch in an almost physical way.
    In Inuit, this becomes Iktsuarpok.

    And then there is that quiet, almost bittersweet awareness that something is beautiful precisely because it will pass.
    Not despite its impermanence, but because of it.
    The Japanese have a word for this: Mono no aware.

    Even the darker corners of being human have found their place in language.

    That subtle, uncomfortable moment when someone else’s misfortune brings a sense of satisfaction you didn’t ask for.
    In German: Schadenfreude.

    If you notice closely, these words do more than describe emotions.
    They carry their weight, their rhythm, their texture.
    Some feel light, others heavy. Some linger longer than others.

    And perhaps this is where something deeper reveals itself:

    Being human may be a shared condition, but the way we are allowed to experience it is not always the same.

    Some cultures make space for certain emotions, while others leave them unnamed — and therefore, often unnoticed.

    And when a feeling has no name in the language we live in,
    it becomes easier to overlook it.
    Not because it is insignificant, but because it has nowhere to stay.

    Yet these experiences are not foreign to us.

    Perhaps learning new words for emotions is not just about language.
    Perhaps it is a way of recognizing parts of ourselves we couldn’t quite name before — not because they were absent, but because they were never fully acknowledged.

    Because to feel is not always loud.
    It is not only a racing heartbeat or a visible reaction.
    Sometimes it sits quietly — in your chest, in your stomach, behind your eyes — waiting to be noticed.

    And when a feeling feels too complex, too layered to be named,
    it might help to remember this:

    Somewhere else, in another language, shaped by another way of seeing the world, someone has already felt it deeply enough to name it.

    You are not alone in your feelings — even when your own language does not seem to have a place for them.

    And maybe learning these words is not only about understanding others, but about finally making space for ourselves.

    If you are curious to explore more of these emotions and the words that hold them, you might enjoy The Book of Human Emotions by Tiffany Watt Smith.

    2 responses to “What Do You Feel?”

    1. The Luttie Board Avatar

      I like how incredible you are in the way you blend emotion, culture, and language together.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. betweeneverywhereandnowhere Avatar

        Thank you! I’m really glad you felt that!

        Like

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • Saturn’s Return or Being Welcomed to True Adulthood

    Saturn’s Return or Being Welcomed to True Adulthood

    Dolce Far Niente, 1904, John William Godward

    I am currently somewhere between 29 and 30 years old — somewhere between what I used to call “not yet” and what others confidently name “adulthood.” For the first time, I understand why this age is considered a threshold.

    From a psychological point of view, these years feel like the first real moment when our biological existence begins to support the idea of being an adult. 

    From an astrological perspective, it is often described as a time of harvesting — reaping what has been sown so far. Retrospectively, I realize I started this blog right at the beginning of that phase. This space became one of Saturn’s quiet gifts; a way to keep track of who I am becoming, and who I have the potential to become.

    Up until last year, I was crying, thinking I had failed to build the adulthood I imagined. I felt crushed under the weight of not being able to manage my own ordinariness. 

    But this year, something shifted. Not dramatically, not all at once — but enough for me to start taking pride in what I could build out of the rubble left in my hands.

    When I look back, I see a pattern — as if the universe tested me theme by theme, until it made me free of almost every fear.

    I grew up in a deeply loving family, and my biggest anxiety was always the idea of losing one of my parents. I thought about it so often that at some point it almost felt like I was rehearsing it. And then — it happened.

    It was like the universe said to me: “Don’t waste your energy in vain. Here you go — your self-fulfilling prophecy!”

    I was faced with one of my greatest fears — with pain, with emptiness. But also, unexpectedly, with a strange sense of clarity and a new kind of freedom. Life did not end. I did not collapse in the way I had imagined.

    I continued. One strength added.

    I have always been someone who values depth over quantity, someone who lets only a few people inside her walls. And still, those few managed to betray me.

    And yet — life went on.

    I used to believe in control. In plans, in cause and effect, in carefully constructed paths. I was certain that if I did not pursue an academic career, my life would fall apart. 

    I built a castle out of my ambitions â€”me and my illusory arrogance, hand-in-hand— within the walls I had built around myself. Then, one by one, those plans failed. 

    Again, I found myself facing the ruins. Not gently, but clearly enough. The universe reminded me that my plans are small in such a vast system. And what remained was not ruin, but space.

    My tests have always been a little harsh and intense. Otherwise, a stubborn, know-it-all spaghetti would probably never have understood how things actually work. 

    It took me 29 years to realize that my “now” is simultaneously my past, my present, and my future. 

    I used to say, almost like a philosopher, that life does not owe us anything.

    It took me 29 years to realize that I do not owe the world a perfectly constructed version of myself either.

    My mind has never been linear. Thoughts scatter — one somewhere in the distance, another right in front of me, another just out of reach. For years, I tried to collect them, organize them, and convert them into some meaningful strings. This was my way to refine my place in this world. 

    Now, I am learning something else: not everything needs to be perfectly articulated to be real. There is a certain relief in allowing things to remain a little unfinished, a little unclear.

    I have always believed that I could handle everything. This year, I admitted something different: just because I can, does not mean I should. Or want to.

    I am learning not to go with the flow, perhaps, but at least no longer to resist it.

    There was a time when I believed that if I had not achieved everything by the age of 25, life would somehow be over.
    Last year, I felt crushed by my perception of reality. This year, I see things differently. Not as success or failure — but as endurance.

    I feel like it is time to shine, but not with something fragile.
    Not like a butterfly emerging from a cocoon, but something else entirely.
    Something formed under pressure, layer by layer. Something like granitic gneiss. Shaped, compressed, transformed — and still here.

    I feel, for the first time, the quiet strength of building an identity.

    A lot has changed, and it will keep changing. But something has settled. The more I try to understand why I exist, the more that question expands into a void I cannot fully grasp. And maybe that is not a problem to solve anymore.

    Sometimes my mind feels scattered, almost absurd — like those self-help books placed next to tomato paste on supermarket shelves. And somehow, that feels accurate.

    I try to embrace it all, and none of it, with the awareness that we are all just a reflected digestion of our experiences.

    Good or bad, right or wrong, successful or not — this is a life.

    And it is mine.

    If you happen to stumble across this corner and experience similar things, or if you have adulting tips for me, I am one comment or e-mail (hello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com) away.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • Me and My Broken Marc Jacobs Glasses

    Me and My Broken Marc Jacobs Glasses

    Dolce Far Niente, 1897, John William Godward

    Sometimes warnings come from the least expected places. Like a pair of glasses.

    I have always been a person who lives with A-to-Z plans — 0-to-100 scenarios — mostly to guarantee myself a stable life and to contribute to society more effectively.

    Eventually, this habit slowly pushed me toward becoming a workaholic. After realizing this and dealing with it for a long time, I tried to simplify my life and limit myself to my full-time job only.

    Then one day, my glasses broke.

    I looked at them and thought, “Okay, time to replace or repair them.”
    But strangely enough, that small incident made me reconsider the financial reality of my current job. I realized that the conditions of my full-time position were far behind providing even a modest life that could comfortably handle sudden expenses.

    And sudden expenses are part of life.

    By “the conditions of my job,” I mean that even during the calmest months, I sometimes work 33 hours straight without sleeping and then continue with another full workday.  The answers we receive for such excessive working conditions are usually limited to a quiet “hı-hım.”

    Overworking? “Hı-hım.”
    Broken glasses? “Hı-hım.”

    So eventually, it was my turn to respond with a “hı-hım.”

    Because I tend to work hard — and also tend to underestimate myself — I had not been fully aware of my role and contributions for quite some time. And this, naturally, allowed certain greedy managers to exploit my labor.

    Our labor — and our intellectual contribution — is, to me, one of the most private and sacred outputs we produce.

    Yes, my broken glasses led me to that realization.

    The more I thought about it, the more I felt triggered. For most of my life, whenever a serious problem occurred, I immediately cut ties. My instinct was always the same: â€śNo, I cannot drag myself into this. Cut ties and move on.”

    But this time, I did something different.

    I could have left immediately.
    But I didn’t.

    As a newly graduated employee, I had built the backbone of this unit in my workplace. I had no intention of breaking that backbone and replacing it with a weak stem. Why would I abandon the apprenticeship structure I had gradually built on my way toward gaining seniority?

    So, I did something less dramatic: I calculated the pros and cons.

    And I remembered something a doctor once told me:

    “Managing adversities of an organ is easier than adapting to its absence — if the situation is not fatal.”

    And yes, this was it.

    I also realized that this shift in perspective would require me to play according to the rules of corporate life. This was not about negotiating for a small salary increase or bargaining over money.

    I had something far more valuable: my labor.

    So, I stopped underestimating my role and responsibilities. If I were to process even a single number incorrectly, it could easily cause a six-month delay for everyone involved.

    That realization changed something in my behavior.

    Instead of quitting, I decided to withdraw my labor accordingly.

    I also had to abandon my old “work done and gone” attitude. I started preserving my labor more carefully. I stopped allowing people to invade my limits or interrupt my work-life balance.

    At the same time, I continued presenting a cooperative and social face. While gradually defining my limits and setting clearer boundaries, people started to sense that something had changed — although they could not fully describe it, because I never gave them an explicit explanation.

    One thing, however, never changed.

    I never lowered the quality of my work. Doing so would go directly against my personal values. The output of my work often touches people’s lives, and for that reason I remain deliberately meticulous about what I do.

    Of course, none of this is rocket science. Many of us have experienced — or will experience — some form of exploitation in our professional lives.

    And most of you probably will not need a broken pair of glasses to notice it.

    But when working hard for everything is part of your personality, it becomes surprisingly easy to overlook exploitation. You are simply too busy participating in multiple projects at the same time.

    At least that was the case for me.

    If you are unhappy with your workplace or the conditions you are working under, my suggestion is simple: move step by step.

    Never underestimate your role and contributions — but also never overestimate them. Try to remain realistic.

    Before anything else, think about your ability to maintain decent life conditions.

    Do not immediately tempt yourself to quit. Unless there are extreme circumstances, it may be wiser to first develop a strategy that protects your boundaries in a stricter and healthier way.

    Your manager is a manager because they manage you. Act accordingly — but do not stand out in a negative way. Observe personalities carefully. Both the cure and the source of many workplace problems are humans, after all: flesh and blood.

    A little Psychology 101 can be surprisingly helpful.

    It can also be useful to polish a specific strength that people begin to associate with you. In my case, for example, I tend to communicate very smoothly with customers from Northern European countries. Whenever I became involved in those processes, things moved forward more easily.

    So, I subtly strengthened that role.
    Over time, I became the person people contacted for anything related to Northern Europe.

    In their minds, a simple code formed:

    me = indispensable for Northern Europe.

    Find similar small strategies that suit your strengths and the nature of your work.

    And above all, remember to think about yourself, your dignity, and your right to a decent life.

    Learn to navigate your emotions as well. A crisis does not necessarily mean you must immediately change your workplace or profession. Sometimes the thing that needs adjustment is your attitude, your working hours, or the boundaries you allow others to cross.

    You usually know the answer better than anyone else.

    I also try to avoid emotional extremes. Whenever my feelings become too intense — whether happiness or frustration — I remind myself that extreme emotions often create a dangerous illusion. When you are overly happy, everything seems possible. When you are deeply frustrated, everything seems impossible.

    Neither state is very reliable.

    In such moments I often listen to Rigoletto, Act III by Giuseppe Verdi, or Delibes: LakmĂ© Act 1 by LĂ©o Delibes â€” or, oddly enough, children’s songs that involve counting down or roaring.

    Yes, honestly. It works.

    And yes — for the record — the glasses are still broken.

    I keep wearing those broken Marc Jacobs glasses to meetings and work dinners.

    Not because I cannot replace them.

    But because they remind me of something I realized a little too late:

    our labor is far more valuable than we tend to believe.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • Astrology, Curiosity and the Search for Meaning

    Astrology, Curiosity and the Search for Meaning

    🎨 I Fantasins Värld, Isaac Grünewald

    Some questions don’t start with belief. They start with curiosity.

    Since my earliest memories, I’ve been trying to understand something beyond daily routines—something about potential, existence, and why we are here at all. Like many who get lost in such questions, I found myself moving between ideas, systems, and ways of explaining life.

    The more I read, the more I noticed something I couldn’t ignore: the universe feels incredibly vast. Yet, I keep returning to something very close: this planet and the bodies surrounding it.

    The Moon moves the oceans, causing tides to come and go. And at some point, I began wondering: if it can move entire oceans, could it influence something within us, even in ways we do not yet fully understand?
    Perhaps the question is not about proof, but about what we are willing to feel without measuring it.

    For the past few months, I’ve explored astrology—not daily horoscopes, but its symbolic language: planets, asteroids, and fixed stars. Not as predictions, but as a framework people use to interpret life. I even use my own experiences as a personal experiment to see how it resonates.

    During this learning process, one sentence resonated with me: “The Moon represents the left eye, while the Sun represents the right.” 

    At first, it sounded poetic, metaphorical, nothing more. But I remembered something I had never questioned before: my right eye has always been more sensitive; I instinctively avoid direct sunlight. The Moon, on the other hand, has always felt different—calm, quiet, and easier. Moon chasing and moon bathing have been my favorite nighttime activities for years.

    Could there be a connection? Or was I merely trying to find one? To test it, I did something simple: one day, at midday, I went outside and stood under the Sun, almost like declaring a small, personal ceasefire. Since then, my right eye has given more stable results at the ophthalmologist. 

    Was it coincidence, conditioning, or did my body respond to something it actually needed? I don’t know. Perhaps that uncertainty is part of the experience itself.

    There are so many things in life beyond my control—timing, outcomes, other people, opportunities. Sometimes, that lack of control feels heavier than expected. Perhaps this is where astrology becomes tempting. Not because it provides answers, but because it offers direction; a sense that moments carry meaning, that something might be aligned even if I don’t fully understand it.

    Maybe astrology is not really about planets. Maybe it is about how we deal with uncertainty. How we look for patterns when we feel we cannot control outcomes. It may not make it true, but it doesn’t make it meaningless either.

    The moment I started studying astrology in depth, seeing my existence through its symbolic “mathematical” lens gave me great excitement. It is an interesting experiment to see Saturn as a harsh mentor or Jupiter as a spiritual protector. I even unlocked a new adjective for myself: Saturnian—someone under the intense influence of Saturn.
    I found astrology surprisingly consistent with the layered structure of human experience: the Ascendant representing our outer experience, the Moon representing emotional tendencies, and so on.

    During this process, I also reflected on the Barnum effect—a cognitive bias where vague statements seem personally meaningful. Yet, I noticed astrology is ultimately about potential. Believing, doubting, or cherry-picking is up to each person. Darker, shadowy aspects of myself caught my interest more, for example.

    Also, when I shared my “new” curiosity with a friend familiar with the astrology, she said: â€śOf course you’d get into astrology. You have Neptune in the 9th house and a retrograde Mercury in the 8th house.” I didn’t know whether to laugh or take it seriously.

    Astrology may not be something we strictly believe in. But, for me, it gave goosebumps through its consistency. Then I thought: “Of course it reflects me—it’s a mathematical mapping of who I am.” 

    Perhaps it’s something we hold onto when certainty is unavailable, or when we are rediscovering our potential. A lens through which we attempt to make sense of randomness, find patterns, and navigate life with intention.

    Ultimately, maybe astrology is less about planets and more about ourselves—our curiosity, our reflection, and the ways we seek connection in uncertainty.
    It can even feel like a subtle collaboration with the planets, fixed stars, and our unique universe.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • We Float on a Planet and Yet…

    We Float on a Planet and Yet…

    🎨 Cloud Study, 1822, John Constable

    We actually live on a planet.
    Not metaphorically. Not poetically. Literally.

    A massive sphere drifting through an endless universe, carrying oceans, mountains, cities and us.

    And yet, most of the time, we hardly feel it.
    We wake up, scroll, work, eat, sleep, as if this is the only reality there is.
    As if the ground beneath our feet were fixed, stable, permanent.
    As if we were not suspended in space at this very moment.

    Sometimes I catch myself looking around and wondering how much of this I truly notice.
    How aware are we of the world we inhabit?
    Or more unsettling: do we really belong to it?

    Because when you think about it, the planet is not equally welcoming everywhere.
    Some places freeze you.
    Some burn you.
    Some suffocate you.
    Some simply do not allow you to stay.
    It is as if the Earth quietly draws invisible boundaries, deciding:
    Here, you may live.
    Here, you may not.

    For most species, that is the end of the story.
    They live where they can.
    And nowhere else.

    Humans, however, are different.

    Not long ago, I watched a couple of videos that stayed with me long after they ended.
    Not only because they were spectacular, but also because they made something very clear: we do not truly belong to some places on our own planet.

    In one, ski mountaineer Andrzej Bargiel climbs Everest without supplemental oxygen.
    Not rushing, just moving one step at a time. At that altitude, even breathing is uncertain. Each step grows heavier than the last. Not because the mountain is steep, but because the body resists where it is.

    His rhythm is no longer his own; it is dictated by oxygen, sunlight, survival.
    It does not look like mere freedom.
    It looks like freedom in negotiation.

    In another, explorer Chris Brown and his team journey to Point Nemo, the most remote place in the ocean.
    The deeper they go, the more their bodies resist.
    Dizziness. Nausea. Vomiting.
    It feels as if the water itself pushes them back, a reminder that this was never meant for us.

    And yet, they persist.
    Not because the place suddenly becomes hospitable, but because we find ways to exist within it.
    And this is what struck me.

    In these moments, I did not merely witness landscapes or feats.
    I saw what happens when humans refuse to accept the boundaries of where they are “allowed” to be.

    We do not simply remain where it is easy.
    We go where it is difficult: climbing where there is no oxygen, diving under crushing pressure.
    We live in extremes of cold, heat, isolation.
    And somehow, we endure.

    Not because the planet grows gentle, but because we adapt.

    And here is the most fascinating part:
    It is not only our bodies that adapt.
    It is our minds.
    Our curiosity.
    Our determination.
    Our intelligence.
    And, perhaps above all, our culture.

    We do not face the world alone.
    We create knowledge. We share it. We build upon it.
    We develop tools, technologies, and ways of living that allow us to survive in places never meant for us.

    We turn the “impossible” into the “manageable.”
    We observe. We learn. We strategize.
    Step by step, we expand the map of where we can exist.

    And sometimes I wonder: is this adaptation or something else entirely?
    Are we learning how to belong?
    Or simply refusing to accept that we do not?

    Perhaps the planet does draw boundaries. But humans are the only species that negotiate with them.

    We do not merely accept limits.
    We test them. We stretch them.
    Sometimes, we even redefine them entirely.

    In doing so, we transform not only our environment, but ourselves.
    We are shaped by the planet, yet constantly reshaping our place within it.
    And that tension is mesmerizing.

    It leaves us suspended somewhere in between.
    Between restriction and freedom.
    Between nature and intention.
    Between being placed and choosing where to stand.

    Perhaps this is what it means to be human:
    Not simply to adapt, but to learn how to move within the world.
    We may not belong everywhere. Yet still, we keep going.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • That Greenland Issue — When Democracy Stops Being a Shield

    That Greenland Issue — When Democracy Stops Being a Shield

    Fiskmarknad i St. Ives, Anders Zorn

    Lately, Greenland has been appearing in the news again. This time caught in a turbulent agenda between the United States and Denmark. Considering the aftermath of the Russia–Ukraine war and the growing security concerns surrounding the Nordic region, this renewed attention is hardly surprising. Yet Greenland rarely appears as the main subject; more often, it functions as a surface onto which larger powers project their anxieties, ambitions, and strategic calculations.

    Still, Greenland is not a new topic. Some time ago, I remember coming across discussions linking Greenland to the United States, alongside the autonomy demands voiced by Greenlandic people themselves. Even then, it felt like more than a geographical matter, more like a quiet reminder of how fragile “belonging” can be for small lands in a world shaped by powerful interests.

    What I am about to write is neither political nor scientific. I do not have the qualifications to produce a paper, nor do I intend to analyze treaties, military strategies, or economic forecasts. This is simply an observation that emerges when I place two names side by side: the United States of America and Denmark.

    If we put history aside for a moment — imperialism, colonialism, wars, and all the heavy baggage humanity carries — we are left with two very different representations of what a “successful country” looks like.

    On one side, there is the United States. A global leader in almost everything: economic power, military capacity, cultural influence, technological dominance. A country that shapes the world, often without asking for permission. Admired, feared, envied — sometimes all at once.

    On the other side, there is Denmark. A country that, for many, represents a kind of modern utopia. A place where I have personally witnessed genuine calm and happiness in people’s eyes. Trust. A sense that life is not constantly lived under pressure.

    In my country, there is a saying: Being an enemy of the United States is hard, but being a friend of it is harder.

    This sentence has stayed with me for years because it does not speak only of hostility or alliances; it speaks of power. Of the cost of proximity to power. Of the subtle ways in which strength demands loyalty, compromise, and silence.

    I want to state my thoughts independently of the current leaders of these countries. Leaders come and go; names change; faces change. But states operate through structures that outlast individuals. At their core, they serve agendas far larger than any single person. There are always bigger plans above smaller plans, systems layered over systems. Almost everyone knows this, even if we rarely articulate it openly.

    What troubles me is the comforting illusion that such dynamics belong only to “unstable regions” or “less developed societies.” As if democracy indices, welfare systems, or economic rankings could somehow exempt a country or its people from being tested. As if development itself were a shield.

    But history keeps proving otherwise. These moments of tension are not exceptions; they are examinations. And they do not discriminate based on development levels or political self-images. They test how power behaves when opportunity arises and how quietly it expects acceptance in return.

    If the Russia–Ukraine war was not enough to remind us of this reality, the Greenland issue certainly should. Not because everything is uncertain, but because nothing is guaranteed when control lacks legitimacy. Not borders, not alliances, not even the moral positions we assume to be stable.

    Yet power does not operate only through states and institutions; it also reveals itself in ordinary reactions, far from negotiation tables and official statements.

    When a devastating earthquake struck my country, I remember reading comments online from some Nordic users saying, “This is karma. God punished them for blocking Sweden and Finland’s entry into NATO.” What disturbed me was not only the cruelty of those words, but how effortlessly they surfaced. How easily judgment replaced responsibility when faces disappeared behind screens.

    That moment stayed with me because it revealed something uncomfortable: no society is immune to moral shortcuts. No level of development erases the human tendency to justify harm once it is framed as deserved, strategic, or necessary.

    This is not resentment. Every land has its own version of “those people.” And it is always easier to spill poisonous ideas when there is no real identity, no real face looking back at you.

    Because societies, no matter how advanced, are ultimately shaped by individuals, these impulses do not disappear; they simply learn new, more acceptable languages.

    Perhaps this is what we keep missing when we say, “This wouldn’t happen in our time.” We forget that no matter how advanced our institutions become, we are still dealing with human impulses: fear, dominance, self-interest. We no longer call it conquest; we call it security. We no longer say control; we say stability. The titles evolve, but the instinct remains.

    Both countries and the people I have encountered from them have shaped me in different ways. Denmark, for instance, gave me Kierkegaard in the simplest form: not merely as a philosopher, but as a reminder of quiet responsibility. For that reason, my thoughts come from closeness, not detachment.

    It may be right or wrong, but there is one thing I have always acknowledged about the United States: it is relentlessly loyal to its own interests. There is a brutal clarity in that. What troubles me is not this pursuit itself, but the way such interests often define the boundaries for everyone else, including those too small to negotiate on equal terms.

    Perhaps this is why Greenland feels like an “issue” again. Not because it suddenly matters more, but because it exposes an old truth we prefer to ignore: in a world governed by interests, control without legitimacy is never neutral. And small lands are often expected to accept it quietly, while the rest of us watch, comforted by the illusion that democracy, development, or distance will always keep us safe.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • Is It Incompatibility to Fit In?

    Is It Incompatibility to Fit In?

    …or do we just mean not to fit in?

    I længselsfulde tanker, Wenzel Tornøe

    We are born within certain borders, raised according to them, and over time we internalize what those borders and their communities show us. A tailored persona is handed to us early on. But does our essence actually accept this persona that borders and their dynamics impose on us?

    Maybe yes.
    Maybe no.
    Maybe intentionally yes.
    Maybe intentionally no.

    A while ago, I was reading Ett nytt land utanför mitt fönster (literally, A New Land Outside My Window) by Theodor Kallifatides.
    As he described his dilemmas, I kept finding echoes of my own thoughts. He is Greek, I am a Turk, and at certain points, our perspectives overlapped almost uncomfortably well.
    That made me think: maybe being someone who cannot fully fit in is not unique at all. Maybe it is universal. And maybe there is nothing special about it, which is, in itself, unsettling.

    In my culture, we are taught very early to “give the best to the other.” To be considerate. To host well. To sacrifice quietly.
    Now, in my young adulthood, I sometimes feel that this land keeps the best for others, while keeping the guest room permanently locked for me. The space is there, clean, prepared, but never really mine.

    Sometimes I try to look at this from the opposite angle. I tell myself that maybe my essence is different because this land also needs difference. But difference is far more easily embraced when you are not considered an integral part of society. When you are an outsider, tolerance has a wide threshold. Difference becomes interesting, even charming.

    Once you are labeled as “one of us,” however, the expectations change. You are then required to behave according to a very specific, carefully tailored script. Difference, at that point, becomes deviation.

    This is not about leaving one’s land or hating one’s own people. Except for extreme circumstances, I do not find that healthy, at least not in my case. Still, in this modern world, being a responsible citizen matters deeply to me.
    I keep thinking: if you live among like-minded people, you must assume all the responsibility required to deserve life within that particular border and among that particular group.

    I have become many things within my own society:

    a daughter,
    a big sister,
    a best friend, a
     student who excelled in languages,
    a student who insisted on not being good at math,
    a reliable colleague, and so on.

    But… being a migrant? Could I become a migrant? Would I ever be capable of carrying this hat, too?

    I am aware that it takes a long time to deserve being an integral part of a society if you arrive later. And if someone were to look at my face and say, “You are not wanted here,” what would I do?
    Unlike my usual personality, I probably would not say anything. Perhaps because I think the native has that right, or perhaps because I am not as certain about my own anymore.

    Recently, I found myself experiencing a different kind of dilemma, what I call losing my religion. Not necessarily faith itself, but something closer to frustration and desperation, to losing the ground beneath my feet.
    I wonder what it would be like to live among people who think similarly. What could I achieve there? Would I be more useful, more productive? Or was the whole point living with a different essence in my own land all along?

    But then again: is it actually my land?

    Sometimes, while jogging through the park, a sentence forms in my mind:
    this country blooms its cities with our tears.
    Then I find these thoughts ridiculous, too dramatic, and make fun of myself and my way of thinking.

    Maybe all the magic lies in living in your own country while carrying a different essence. Or maybe, in another place, I would become nothing at all: typical, standard, unremarkable.
    Being “the spicy one” is not a sustainable trait when you cannot convert that spice into something tangible, something productive, into energy, or at least into light. Also, will I have enough space to enjoy my different essence while blending a new personality with my brand-new identity of “migrant”?

    Maybe it is all about the need to feel important. Or different. Or necessary. Or just being able to meet the ends.

    And yet, at its core, it may have always been something very ordinary.

    Maybe it is not the right time yet.
    Maybe the planets do not allow it.
    Maybe they push you forward.
    Maybe God has a plan.
    Maybe it is karma.
    Maybe it is frequency.
    Maybe it is all about vibe.
    Or maybe it is just coincidence.

    Should it happen?
    I do not know. Not yet.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • Granite Gneiss as an Idol

    Granite Gneiss as an Idol

    Have you ever bumped into a piece of granitic gneiss? More specifically, a migmatitic gneiss?

    This stone does not come from the Earth’s core, but from depths where pressure and heat are sufficient to reshape rock without melting it. Once granite, born from fire as an igneous rock, it later becomes gneiss, transformed under the slow, persistent force of the Earth’s crust. What changes is not its existence, but its structure; its identity reorganizes without destruction.

    After this seemingly violent journey, it emerges with an elegant and solid presence. Its feldspar and quartz quietly shine, not loudly, not insistently. Watching and learning about this kind of transformation, it becomes almost impossible not to think about human endurance.

    Perhaps the first step of endurance is accepting the dynamics of one’s own life. I accepted early on that my life could be turbulent most of the time. Yet it is less about what happens to us and more about what we choose to become, about where we decide to stand. What should happen has happened, is happening, and will happen anyway.

    This solid rock reminds me of the capacity to make the best of pressure. Pressure does not always aim to destroy; sometimes, it reorganizes. The immense forces it faced did not cause it to fall apart, but to realign its internal structure, to transform without losing its essence

    Diamonds are often presented as the ultimate symbol of endurance under pressure, a balance between pressure and elegance taken to its brightest extreme. But endurance does not always seek brilliance. Not everyone, and not everything, is meant to become visually outstanding.

    I place myself much closer to granite gneiss: stable, solid, mostly grey, yet carrying its own quiet sparkles. It shines partially, without demanding attention, offering instead a sense of security, endurance, and silent elegance.

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com

  • I Cannot Be a Hygge Girl

    I Cannot Be a Hygge Girl

    Too much anger, too much fury, too much negativity, too much exploitation, maybe too much reality.
    Whatever we choose to call it.

    Sometimes, I want to shed this crust of anger and awareness, to feel as light as possible, even for a moment. To soften. To float. To rest.
    But I cannot.

    We are constantly encouraged to heal inward. To slow down. To withdraw from the daily rush. Hygge, the Danish philosophy of coziness and intentional comfort, or meditation, which teaches us to focus on a single point and quiet the noise, all promise relief. And for some, they work.

    But I keep asking myself: what is the meaning of all this, if the magic disappears the moment you open your eyes?

    I cannot unsee what is happening around the world. I am not extraordinary in any sense, just another ordinary someone among millions. And yet, I feel deeply empathetic toward others, while simultaneously constructing dystopian future scenarios for myself, shaped by everything I witness around me. Awareness, once acquired, does not politely step aside when you ask for peace.

    Most of the time, I argue with myself.
    “You are under too much stress,” I say. “You cannot even focus on meditation or any kind of hygge mindset. But what real change could you possibly bring to the table, even if stress became your core identity? Probably not much. What would change if you turned that anger inside out? Nothing, most likely.”

    And yet, silencing it feels equally wrong.

    I find myself trapped in a constant rollercoaster of dilemma. A dilemma between self-preservation and moral alertness. There is that well-known prayer: God, give me the strength to accept the things I cannot change. Some days, I tell myself to prioritize my health, to step away from the current agenda, to go with the flow. Other days, this feels hollow, as if deliberately unseeing, deliberately tolerating, is a quiet betrayal of my own conscience.

    Lately, I have been wondering whether our obsession with escaping discomfort might be doing more harm than good. What if that persistent tightness in the chest, that boredom, that inner unrest is not a flaw to be corrected, but a signal to be interpreted? What if constantly soothing ourselves, numbing every sharp edge, slowly damages something more primitive in us, our survival instinct, our ability to sense when something is fundamentally wrong?

    At the core, I believe boredom begins when something in your life needs to change. The dynamics shift, and boredom becomes the warning light. In that sense, it is not laziness or indifference, but information. And I am afraid of becoming careless toward such vital signals, afraid of mistaking anesthetization for healing.

    Perhaps it is the over-exploiting nature of our time that makes focusing on inner peace feel almost unethical. Or perhaps we have internalized the long-term consequences of individualism for too long, confusing detachment with wisdom. I do not know.

    Of course, there must be a balanced space somewhere in between, between collapsing under the weight of the world and pretending it does not exist. I have not found that place yet. But for now, this unresolved tension itself has become one of my resolutions for 2026: not to escape discomfort too quickly, not to romanticize it either, but to listen before I attempt to quiet it.

    What I am searching for is not comfort, but my kind of hygge — one that can coexist with an awareness born from discomfort.
    For now, I remain outside of it.

    🎨 In the Hammock by Anders Zorn

    Leave a comment

    đź’Śhello@betweeneverywhereandnowhere.com